[Editor’s note 12/23/24: This article has been updated to include a response from Chief Legal and Privacy Officer at Tools for Humanity, Damien Kieren. Also, an earlier sentence concerning an order to delete biometric data collected during initial operations has been removed, as World had deleted old iris data with its launch of the SCMP system earlier this year.]
Germany’s data protection regulator has ordered Worldcoin to implement stricter data protection measures. This ruling follows an investigation by the Bavarian State Office for Data Protection Supervision (BayLDA) that began in April 2023, marking a significant development for the recently rebranded digital identity company.
The investigation focused on Worldcoin’s collection and processing of iris-derived biometric data for its World ID system, which aims to authenticate unique individuals and prevent duplicate registrations. The company’s technology uses specialized “Orb” devices to scan users’ irises and create unique digital identities, a system that has been rapidly expanding globally despite regulatory challenges.
Under the December 19, 2024 ruling, Worldcoin must implement a GDPR-compliant data deletion procedure within one month of the decision taking effect. The company must also obtain explicit user consent for specific data processing activities and delete previously collected iris codes that were gathered without sufficient legal basis during 2023.
“With today’s decision, we are enforcing European fundamental rights standards in favor of the data subjects in a technologically demanding and legally highly complex case,” said BayLDA President Michael Will. “All users who have provided ‘Worldcoin’ with their iris data will in future have the unrestricted opportunity to enforce their right to erasure.”
The World Foundation, which operates World, has appealed the decision. The organization is seeking judicial clarity regarding whether its Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs) fulfill the EU’s legal definition for anonymization, arguing that the lack of clear definitions complicates privacy protection efforts in the digital age.
Responding to the ruling, Damien Kieren, the Chief Legal and Privacy Officer at Tools for Humanity, emphasized the privacy protections of World’s anonymization technology.
“Data anonymization, not just data deletion, is essential for enabling people to verify themselves as human online while remaining completely private. Without a clear definition around anonymization, however, we lose perhaps our most powerful tool in the fight to protect privacy in the age of AI,” Kieren explained. “The breakthrough multi-party computation setup implemented by World Foundation makes it effectively impossible to link anonymized data back to an individual. We believe strongly that this kind of effective anonymization should be the standard. If what’s required, however, is true technical anonymization, or absolute certainty that anonymized data cannot be linked back to a person even in purely theoretical situations, that would render anonymization impossible and instead incentivize companies to continue storing personal data in an identifiable form.
The ruling does not address certain aspects of Worldcoin’s operations, including matters related to the protection of minors and potential administrative offenses, which remain under separate examination by the authority. This partial scope reflects the complex nature of regulating emerging biometric identity technologies under existing privacy frameworks.
Worldcoin has faced regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions. In Kenya, for example, authorities temporarily suspended operations over privacy, security, and financial concerns, though the investigation was later closed without further action. The project continues to face examination in other regions regarding its data collection practices and compliance with local regulations, even as it expands into new markets like Panama.
Sources: CryptoSlate, CoinTelegraph, ICOHolder
–
December 20, 2024 – by Ali Nassar-Smith
Follow Us