The UK Parliament’s Home Affairs Committee has opened an inquiry into “new forms of digital ID,” framing its work around both the potential uses of digital identity systems and the risks they may introduce.
The inquiry, titled “Harnessing the potential of new forms of digital ID,” is structured around written evidence submissions and oral evidence sessions, and sits alongside a broader UK policy landscape that includes government identity programs and trust framework work for the private sector.
Committee materials describe the inquiry as looking at how new types of digital identity could work in practice and what safeguards would be needed. For digital identity and biometrics vendors, parliamentary inquiries can matter even when they don’t create direct legal obligations: they can shape expectations around identity assurance, inclusion, privacy protections, and accountability when credentials are used across public and private sector contexts.
Those questions tend to surface quickly when digital identity moves beyond a single service. Interoperability between public and private sector identity providers, rules for attribute sharing, and limits on reuse of identity data can determine whether digital ID reduces fraud without expanding surveillance or excluding people who struggle with remote verification. The committee’s inquiry is likely to press witnesses on those tradeoffs.
The inquiry follows continuing scrutiny of the UK’s central government identity program. In 2025, the UK’s One Login digital ID system lost a key security certification, a development that added fuel to debates about assurance and governance for identity services used across government.
It also overlaps with the UK’s evolving trust framework and accreditation ecosystem. The government published a gamma version of its digital identity framework in 2025, and later reporting suggested a broader digital ID consultation could slip into 2026 as policy ownership shifted.
At the operational level, government identity verification has already expanded into specific services. Companies House, for example, has adopted GOV.UK One Login for digital identity verification as the UK pursues new controls over corporate filings and director identity checks.
The committee’s inquiry will likely draw evidence from government, civil society, vendors and academic experts on where digital ID can reduce fraud and friction, and where it could create new surveillance or exclusion risks if deployed without clear limits and oversight.
Sources: UK Parliament (Committees), UK Parliament Publications
–
By Ali Nassar-Smith
