The Investing and Saving Alliance has urged the UK government to build stronger safeguards into its proposed digital ID system, warning that financial services firms will need clear rules on fraud, revocation, death notifications and liability if they are expected to rely on government-backed digital identity. The trade group submitted its response to the Cabinet Office consultation on digital identity as ministers consider how digital ID could support public services and private-sector use cases.
TISA supports several parts of the government’s approach, including certified digital wallets, a government checker service and a legal duty for individuals to update government-held information when details change. The group says digital ID could simplify account opening, make it easier for consumers to switch financial products, reduce barriers for people without photo ID and help counter financial crime by reducing reliance on paper documents.
The submission also highlights operational risks for banks, investment platforms, insurers and other firms that may consume digital ID signals. TISA wants a notification process when a digital ID is deleted or revoked so firms can run their own verification checks and assess suspicious activity. It also wants an agreed mechanism for notifying financial services providers when a person dies, both to prevent fraud and to support the return of funds still held in financial products.
The response lands as the UK continues to refine its digital identity policy. The government previously faced opposition to a mandatory digital ID plan for workers, while separate procurement work has moved ahead through a public beta contract for the Digital Verification Service register. Those developments have put interoperability, privacy and governance at the center of the rollout.
TISA represents about 270 savings and investment firms. Its response focuses on how a national digital ID would behave once it enters live financial workflows: what happens when an identity is stolen, deleted, revoked, updated or linked to a deceased customer. The group argues that consumer trust will depend on those failure-handling rules as much as on the enrollment process itself.
Those operational questions are central for regulated firms because a digital ID can become part of onboarding, account maintenance and fraud monitoring. If a credential is later compromised, revoked or deleted, financial institutions need to know whether they can rely on the original government check or must restart their own customer due diligence.
Sources: IT Brief UK, GOV.UK
–
By the ID Tech Editorial Team







Follow Us