An Illinois bill that would broadly bar police use of biometric identification systems is drawing fresh backlash even as the measure remains stuck in the state House process. House Bill 5521, titled the Biometric Surveillance Act, would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from using biometric systems, according to the official bill synopsis published by the Illinois General Assembly.
The proposal is sweeping in scope. It covers biometric identification systems used by law enforcement, while preserving a narrow exception allowing the Secretary of State to use facial recognition for identity verification tied to mobile driver’s licenses and ID cards. The bill would also let the Illinois attorney general bring civil actions to enforce the act. Official bill records show the last formal action came on March 27, 2026, when the measure was re-referred to the Rules Committee under House Rule 19(a).
The fresh hook is the backlash around that proposal. An April 4 report from southern Illinois says Rep. Patrick Sheehan sharply criticized the bill and that 227 witness slips had been filed in opposition, with one in support. The measure is therefore drawing organized opposition even before any further House action. The fight is also not limited to facial recognition because the bill text addresses biometric identification systems more broadly. It would apply across state and local law-enforcement agencies.
The Illinois debate also lands in a broader moment of scrutiny around U.S. government biometrics. Recent reporting showed that a DHS facial recognition app draws from a 1.2 billion-image database, while other jurisdictions have moved toward tighter rules, including cases where biometric privacy codes imposed necessity tests. Illinois itself has already seen local disputes over biometric surveillance in private settings.
The bill would not simply set use conditions or retention rules. It would shut off most police access to biometric identification tools while leaving a narrow mobile-ID carveout in place. Even if the measure does not move immediately, the text shows how far some U.S. jurisdictions are willing to go in trying to limit official biometric use.
Sources: Illinois General Assembly, Illinois General Assembly, WFIW
–
By the ID Tech Editorial Team
