The Federal Communications Commission has proposed tighter Know Your Customer requirements for voice service providers as part of its effort to reduce illegal robocalls before they enter U.S. phone networks. The proposal would strengthen obligations on originating providers to vet customers, monitor for suspicious call traffic and face penalties tied to unlawful calls when their customer-screening practices fall short.
The proceeding focuses on providers that originate calls, including traditional voice, VoIP and mobile services. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said some providers are doing too little to vet customers, allowing bad actors to infiltrate phone networks. The proposal would close gaps in existing KYC obligations and add per-call penalties intended to align enforcement with the harm caused by robocall campaigns.
The FCC is seeking comment on what information providers should collect from customers, whether date of birth or other personally identifiable information should be required, how that data should be protected and how risks created by larger identity data collections can be mitigated. The agency is also asking how providers should handle high-volume originating services and what practices should count as affirmative, effective customer knowledge.
Although the proposal is not a biometric rule, it sits within the same identity assurance problem facing financial services, telecommunications and online platforms: verifying who is behind an account or service before fraud scales. Similar identity assurance concerns appear in AI-generated digital impersonation fraud and synthetic identity fraud, where weak onboarding can let abuse move quickly across networks.
For communications providers, stronger KYC may involve more structured document checks, corporate formation records, proof of good standing, phone-number confirmation, address records, commercial-presence checks, traffic monitoring and account review before high-volume calling is allowed. The FCC is still at the rulemaking stage, so the final requirements will depend on comments and subsequent commission action. The direction is clear: robocall enforcement is moving upstream from call blocking toward identity checks on the entities allowed to originate traffic.
The proposal could also affect vendors that provide business identity, document authentication and fraud-risk tooling to telecom providers. If final rules require stronger customer validation, voice service providers may need systems that can verify legal entities, screen representatives and preserve audit records before assigning calling privileges or allowing high-volume traffic.
Sources: FCC
–
By Cass Kennedy
